Logic and Complexity by Richard Lassaigne, Michel de Rougemont (auth.)

By Richard Lassaigne, Michel de Rougemont (auth.)

Logic and Complexity appears at uncomplicated common sense because it is utilized in machine technological know-how, and offers scholars with a logical method of Complexity concept. With lots of routines, this booklet provides classical notions of mathematical common sense, corresponding to decidability, completeness and incompleteness, in addition to new principles introduced via complexity conception resembling NP-completeness, randomness and approximations, delivering a greater knowing for effective algorithmic strategies to difficulties.

Divided into 3 elements, it covers:

- version concept and Recursive capabilities - introducing the fundamental version idea of propositional, 1st order, inductive definitions and second order good judgment. Recursive features, Turing computability and decidability also are tested.

- Descriptive Complexity - taking a look at the connection among definitions of difficulties, queries, houses of courses and their computational complexity.

- Approximation - explaining how a few optimization difficulties and counting difficulties will be approximated in response to their logical shape.

Logic is critical in computing device technological know-how, really for verification difficulties and database question languages corresponding to SQL. scholars and researchers during this box will locate this ebook of significant curiosity.

Show description

Read or Download Logic and Complexity PDF

Similar logic books

Character Evidence: An Abductive Theory (Argumentation Library)

This publication examines the character of proof for personality judgments, utilizing a version of abductive reasoning referred to as Inference To the simplest clarification. The e-book expands this suggestion in line with fresh paintings with types of reasoning utilizing argumentation thought and synthetic intelligence. the purpose isn't just to teach how personality judgments are made, yet how they need to be accurately be made in keeping with sound reasoning, warding off universal error and superficial judgments.

Additional resources for Logic and Complexity

Sample text

T« where R is a relation symbol ofarity nand t], t2, "" t« are terms; this formula can also be written as R(t], tz,. ,tn ) . The set of formulas is the smallest set containing atomic formulas and which is closed under the application of operators and quantifiers . 5. The set offormulas, denoted by F, is the smallest set such that: • every atomic formula is a formula, • ifF is aformula, then r-F is aformula, • ifF, G are formulas, then (F 1\ G), (F V G), (F -t G) and (F ++ G) are formulas, • ifF is aformula and va variable, then Vv F and 3v F are formulas.

The result of the substitution of the term f z for the variable x in the formula F(x) : ((Rex /\ -'x = c) /\ (3y gyy = x)) is the formula ((Rcfz /\ -,fz = c) /\ (3y gyy = fz)) . 5. lf F is a formula, x afree variable in F and t a term such that the substitution oftfor x in F is defined, then the formulas (VxF -r F(t/x)) and (F(t/x) -r 3xF) are valid. 3. PRENEX FORMULAS AND SKOLEM FORMS 51 Proof: We show by induction on formula F that the satisfaction of the formula F(t/x) by the interpretation 8 is equivalent to that of the formula F(x) by the interpretation 81, where 81 is obtained from 8 by assigning the value t S to the variable x.

A k all atomic formulas occurring in G. There is a propositional formula H constructed with the variables {PI ,P2, . . 3. PRENEX FORMULAS AND SKOLEM FORMS 53 equal to the formula H(AI/PI' AdP2, . . , Ak/Pk). Let HI be a conjunctive normal form equivalent to H , as constructed in propositional logic. The following transformations are used for this construction: • elimination of the connectives -+, H using the connectives -', V, 1\, • moving negations as far inside as possible, by using De Morgan's rules such that negations are applied only to propositional variables, • distributing conjunctions over disjunctions.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.23 of 5 – based on 9 votes