Abstract Algebra II by Randall R. Holmes By Randall R. Holmes

Similar linear books

Lie groups, physics, and geometry : an introduction for physicists, engineers and chemists

"Describing a few of the most crucial points of Lie workforce concept, this booklet provides the topic in a hands-on method. instead of focusing on theorems and proofs, the publication exhibits the connection of Lie teams to many branches of arithmetic and physics and illustrates those with concrete computations.

Linear Triatomic Molecules - OCO. Part b

Quantity II/20 presents significantly evaluated info on loose molecules, bought from infrared spectroscopy and comparable experimental and theoretical investigations. the amount is split into 4 subvolumes, A: Diatomic Molecules, B: Linear Triatomic Molecules, C: Nonlinear Triatomic Molecules, D: Polyatomic Molecules.

Extra resources for Abstract Algebra II

Sample text

The factorization −120 = (−3)(2)(5)(−2)(−2), also exhibits −120 as a product of irreducible elements. This second factorization can be reordered as −120 = (−2)(−2)(2)(−3)(5) and comparing with the earlier factorization −120 = (−2)(2)(2)(3)(5) we see that corresponding factors are indeed associates. A field is a UFD (vacuously since a field has no nonzero nonunits). An example of an integral domain that is not a UFD is given in Exercises 8–1 and 8–3. 5 A PID is a UFD An integral domain R is a principal ideal domain, or PID for short, if every ideal of R is principal.

The following theorem says that the notions “quotient of R” and “homomorphic image of R” amount to the same thing. 1 Theorem. If R/I (I R) is a quotient of R, then R/I is a homomorphic image of R, namely, the image under the canonical epimorphism π : R → R/I. Conversely, the image im ϕ = ϕ(R) of R under a homomorphism ϕ : R → R is isomorphic to a quotient of R, namely R/ ker ϕ. Proof. 2. 1). 3 Second Isomorphism Theorem Let R be a ring, let S be a subring of R and let I be an ideal of R. By Exercise 7–1, S +I is a subring of R.

Since a and b are relatively prime, it follows that p divides the coefficient of every term of g (x)f (x). But this product is primitive by Gauss’s lemma, so this is a contradiction. Therefore, b = ±1 as claimed. Therefore, f (x) = g1 (x)h1 (x), where g1 (x) = (a/b)g (x) = ±ag (x) ∈ Z[x] and h1 (x) = h (x) ∈ Z[x]. Moreover, g1 (x) and h1 (x) have the same degrees as g(x) and h(x), respectively. (ii) We prove the contrapositive. Assume that f (x) is not irreducible over Q. Since f (x) is nonconstant, it is a nonzero nonunit, so it has a proper factorization f (x) = g(x)h(x) with g(x), h(x) ∈ Q[x].